Legal Opinion
Ames v. Texaco, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided June 21, 1983No. G82-918 CA7PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION RE: MOTIONS TO DISMISS OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
HILLMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff brought this action for injunctive relief and damages under the Petroleum Marketing Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 2801 et seq., and various unspecified antitrust statutes. The matter is presently before the court on defendants’ motions to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment. The court will address these motions jointly.
I. DISCUSSION
A. Facts.
Plaintiff, George Ames, operated a gas station known as “George’s Texaco” in Mason County, Michigan, from May 15, 1972, until April…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Jimmy P. Davis, as of the Estate of Dallas D. Hardy, Jr., Deceased v. Piper Aircraft CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- California Arco Distributors, Inc. v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Court of Appeal · 1984
- Midwest Petroleum Co. v. American Petrofina, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1985
- Brown v. Magness Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1985
- Ames (George) D/B/A George's Texaco v. Texaco, Inc., Blarney Castle Oil Co., McCarthy (Dennis E.)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- Daniel S. Boschert, Inc. v. Shell Oil Co.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1987