Legal Opinion
California Arco Distributors, Inc. v. Atlantic Richfield Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 17, 1984No. Civ. 66562PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McCLOSKY, J.
On October 5, 1982, defendant Atlantic Richfield Company (ARCO) appealed from the preliminary injunction issued on October 1, 1982, in favor of plaintiffs California ARCO Distributors, Inc. (CADI) and Little Oil Company, Inc. (Little). (2d Civ. No. 66562.)
On June 1, 1983, ARCO appealed from an order dated April 19, 1983, wherein the trial court denied ARCO’s motion to dissolve the preliminary injunction. Said motion was made during the pendency of the appeal from the preliminary injunction. (2d Civ. No. B002911.)
On July 1, 1983, by order of this court, we consolidated these…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Jones v. Rath Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Perez. v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Mabry v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Barnes v. Gulf Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
- Unocal Corp. v. KaabipourCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- W. W. Dean & Associates v. City of South San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Rustom v. Atlantic Richfield Co.District Court, C.D. California · 1985
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.