Legal Opinion
Daniel S. Boschert, Inc. v. Shell Oil Co.
District Court, N.D. Texas
Decided June 11, 1987No. CA3-86-788-FPublished
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ROBERT W. PORTER, Chief Judge.
This case is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. Having reviewed the motion, the response thereto, the pleadings and evidence on file, and the applicable law, the Court is of the opinion the motion must be granted.
Plaintiff here complains that Defendant Shell Oil violated the Petroleum Marketing Practices Act (PMPA), 15 U.S.C. § 2801 et seq., when it terminated its franchise agreement with Plaintiff in 1985. The facts are essentially uncontroverted. Plaintiff and Defendant had a franchise agreement for the service station located at…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- William C. Brach, Cross-Appellant v. Amoco Oil Company, a Maryland Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Checkrite Petroleum, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Amoco Oil Company, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Russo v. Texaco, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1986
- Howard Lugar v. Texaco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Russo v. Texaco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.