Legal Opinion
City of Hawaiian Gardens v. City of Long Beach
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 2, 1998No. Docket Nos. B094380, B098429PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
EPSTEIN, Acting P. J .
— The City of Long Beach appeals from a trial court adjudication that it is not entitled to close one of its streets at the border with the City of Hawaiian Gardens. The ruling is based on Vehicle Code section 21101, subdivision (f) (section 21101(f)), which we shall discuss in detail.
Hawaiian Gardens has cross-appealed from the trial court’s denial of its motion for attorney’s fees under Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5 and 42 United States Code section 1988.
We conclude that the proposed closure was inconsistent with section 21101(f) because closure of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Woodland Hills Residents Ass'n v. City Council of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Hewlett v. Squaw Valley Ski Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- Rumford v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- County of Inyo v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- City of Poway v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- City of Maywood v. Los Angeles Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Mejia v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Families Unafraid To Uphold Rural El Dorado County v. El Dorado County Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Williams v. San Francisco Board of Permit AppealsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Consumer Cause, Inc. v. Mrs. Gooch's Natural Food Markets, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.