Legal Opinion

Rumford v. City of Berkeley

California Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1982No. S.F. 24239PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

NEWMAN, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment that mandates the City of Berkeley to remove traffic barriers from over 40 streets. The action was filed by several individuals and Citizens for Legal Action Against the Barricades, an unincorporated association. Other individuals and Berkeleyans for Fair Traffic Management (another unincorporated association) were allowed to intervene. The City and interveners have appealed from the grant of mandate; plaintiffs have cross-appealed, inter alla, from denial of their motion for attorneys’ fees.1

We must decide whether Berkeley had authority to…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Woodland Hills Residents Ass'n v. City Council of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Solberg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Ex Parte DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Palos Verdes Faculty Ass'n v. Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Pipoly v. BensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Ingersoll v. PalmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Citizens Against Rent Control v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  3. San Bernardino Valley Audubon Society, Inc. v. County of San BernardinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. O'CONNELL v. City of StocktonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  5. ARA Living Centers-Pac, Inc. v. SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN MATEO CTY.California Court of Appeal · 1993

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API