Consumer Cause, Inc. v. Mrs. Gooch's Natural Food Markets, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PERLUSS, P. J.
Is an unnamed member of a putative class who successfully objects to class certification and approval of a proposed class-wide settlement agreement entitled to an award of attorney fees under either Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5, 1 which codifies the private attorney general doctrine articulated in Serrano v. Priest (1977) 20 Cal.3d 25 [141 Cal.Rptr. 315, 569 P.2d 1303] (Serrano III), 2 or general equitable principles? As to the first part of the question, because the objector is not the functional equivalent of a private attorney general pursuing an action to…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Devlin v. ScardellettiSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Consumer Privacy CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Hernandez v. Restoration Hardware, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2018
- Chavez v. Netflix, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- Hartless v. Clorox Co.District Court, S.D. California · 2011
- Savaglio v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.