Legal Opinion
County of Inyo v. City of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 27, 1978No. Civ. 13886PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FRIEDMAN, J.
We deny Inyo County’s motion for imposition of costs (amounting to $1,067.61) and an attorney fee (of $85,267.50) against the adverse party, City of Los Angeles.
The lawsuit is an original mandate action in which Inyo County is the petitioner and Los Angeles the respondent. In 1973 we issued a peremptory writ of mandate directing the City of Los Angeles and its department of water and power to prepare an environmental impact report covering their increased extraction and use of Owens Valley groundwater. (County of Inyo v. Yorty (1973) 32 Cal.App.3d 795 [108 Cal.Rptr. 377];…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Newman v. Piggie Park Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Sprague v. Ticonic National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Woodland Hills Residents Ass'n v. City Council of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Serrano v. UnruhCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Folsom v. Butte County Assn. of GovernmentsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- North Bay Regional Center v. MaldonadoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Beach Colony II v. California Coastal Com.California Court of Appeal · 1985
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.