Legal Opinion

Travis v. Preston

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 4, 2002No. Docket 221756PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON REHEARING

Before: Talbot, P.J. and Sawyer and Markey, JJ. Markey, J.

In this case regarding alleged odors and fumes emanating from defendants Keith and Glenn Preston’s hog-farming operation, Preston Farms, defendants appeal by right the trial court’s order of judgment, entered after a bench trial, awarding plaintiffs Pete and Edna Travis $29,000 in damages and plaintiffs Richard and Patricia Johnson $29,000 in damages. We reverse and remand.

After defendants began a hog-farming operation in 1996, plaintiffs, who' lived near the hog farm, filed this action for nuisance and injunctive relief…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Oakland County Board v. Michigan Property & Casualty Guaranty Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Franks v. White Pine Copper DivisionMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Frank W Lynch & Co v. Flex Technologies, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Feaheny v. CaldwellMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Rose Hill Center, Inc v. Holly TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Lima Twp v. BatesonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Shelby Charter Township v. PapeshMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Davis v. ChatmanMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Travis v. PrestonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Aztec Air Service, Inc. v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API