Legal Opinion

Frank W Lynch & Co v. Flex Technologies, Inc

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 2001No. Docket 115324PublishedCited by 114 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.

The sales representatives’ commissions act (srca), MCL 600.2961; MSA 27A.2961, provides, among other things, that, in addition to actual damages, a defendant may be liable for up to an additional $100,000 for an intentional failure to pay sales commissions when due. We granted leave to determine whether the SRCA should be applied retroactively.

The Court of Appeals followed its decision in Flynn v Flint Coatings, Inc, 230 Mich App 633; 584 NW2d 627 (1998), and held that the SRCA should be applied retroactively. We disagree and hold that the srca operates prospectively only. Accordingly, we…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Kewin v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Weymers v. KheraMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Donajkowski v. Alpena Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Franks v. White Pine Copper DivisionMichigan Supreme Court · 1985

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by114 opinions

  1. Pohutski v. City of Allen ParkMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Odom v. Wayne CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Mayor of Lansing v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Kenneth Henes Special Projects Procurement, Marketing & Consulting Corp. v. Continental Biomass Industries, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Herald Co. v. Eastern Michigan University Board of RegentsMichigan Supreme Court · 2006

109 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API