Legal Opinion
Feaheny v. Caldwell
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided February 23, 1989No. Docket 97770PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShepherd, J.
A jury trial was held on Thomas J. Feaheny’s claims for conspiracy, tortious interference with his employment contract with the Ford Motor Company, and tortious interference with his economic expectancy stemming from his employment with the Ford Motor Company. A bifurcated trial was held so that liability and damages would be separately tried to the same jury. Defendants moved for a directed verdict on all liability issues at trial. The trial court granted the motion on the conspiracy claim, but took the motion under advisement as to the remaining tortious interference claims. The jury found…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Toussaint v. Blue Cross & Blue ShieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
- Matras v. Amoco Oil Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1986
- Dzierwa v. Michigan Oil Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1986
- Bonelli v. Volkswagen of America, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
- Formall, Inc. v. Community National BankMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Forrester v. StockstillTennessee Supreme Court · 1994
- Dxs, Inc., a Michigan Corporation, F/k/a Flint X-Ray, Inc. v. Siemens Medical Systems, Inc., a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Prysak v. R L Polk Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1992
- Admiral Insurance v. Columbia Casualty InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
- Mildred A. Johnson, Cross-Appellant v. Honeywell Information Systems, Inc., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.