Legal Opinion

Shelby Charter Township v. Papesh

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 2, 2005No. Docket 259965PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, P.J.

Defendants Vikki Papesh and Martin Papesh, Jr., appeal as of right the trial court’s order granting summary disposition in favor of plaintiff Shelby Township and denying defendants’ counter-motion for summary disposition. The trial court determined that the “active poultry coop” 1 on defendants’ property constitutes a nuisance per se in violation of plaintiffs zoning regulations, and permanently enjoined defendants “from keeping, raising, harvesting and/or otherwise producing poultry or poultry products” on their property. This appeal presents the question whether defendants’ poultry…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Koontz v. Ameritech Services, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Robertson v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2002
  3. People v. LlewellynMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Rose v. National Auction GroupMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Kefgen v. DavidsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Lima Twp v. BatesonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Ter Beek v. City of WyomingMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. Linton v. Arenac County Road CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Riddle v. LanserAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Gmoser's Septic Service, LLC v. East Bay Charter TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API