Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Willis

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas

Decided November 14, 2011No. 19-40104PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ROBERT E. NUGENT, Chief Judge.

With the 2005 enactment of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act came an amendment to § 1325’s confirmation requirements, § 1325(a)(5)(B)(iii), that mandates that if a debtor’s plan proposes periodic payments on certain secured claims, those proposed payments must be in equal monthly amounts. In these four cases, the debtors have followed a long-standing practice and proposed that their secured creditors be paid monthly, but in pro-rated amounts based upon the creditors’ ratable shares of each monthly disbursement after…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. In Re DeSardiUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2006
  2. In Re HillUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2007
  3. Royals v. Massey (In Re Denton)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Georgia · 2007
  4. In Re ErwinUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois · 2007
  5. In Re BalderasUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re MiceliUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
  2. In re WilliamsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
  3. In Re KirkUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 2012
  4. In re RomeroUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2015
  5. Taukita Lauryce SharpUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API