Legal Opinion
In re Miceli
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided July 9, 2018No. Bankruptcy No. 17-82877PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Thomas M. Lynch, United States Bankruptcy Judge
Associated Bank, N.A., a secured creditor, objects to confirmation of the amended Chapter 13 Plan proposed by Anthony Miceli. (ECF No. 30.) Associated Bank objects to the Debtor's proposal to distribute smaller monthly payments to the secured creditor for its mortgage arrearage claim until the allowed claim of the Debtors attorneys is paid in full, after which the payments to the creditor will increase. The creditor contends that this arrangement violates the requirement for confirmation that periodic payments under section 1325(a)(5)(B)(iii)(I)…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Lamie v. United States TrusteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Rake v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. Randall K. WoodCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Harris v. ViegelahnSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- In Re DeSardiUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2006
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In re SheltonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
- Alberta SellersUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2022
- Barbara Jean RandellUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2022
- CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION v. THOMPSON, SR.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2019
- Chad T. OlsenUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2019
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.