Legal Opinion
In Re Balderas
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas
Decided April 20, 2005No. 19-10060PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
decision on Motion Requesting Allowance of Attorneys’ Fees
LEIF M. CLARK, Bankruptcy Judge.
This is a decision dealing primarily with post-confirmation attorney’s fees sought by debtors’ counsel. The debtors filed a motion seeking modification of their plan because they had fallen behind on plan payments, due in part to a loss of job. The modification sought to further extend the term of the plan to deal with their having fallen behind on their plan payments. The motion also sought attorneys’ fees of $350 for the preparation and presentation of the motion. The motion was approved, and an order…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Offshore Logistics, Inc. v. TallentireSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Guidry v. Sheet Metal Workers National Pension FundSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- In Re Busy Beaver Building Centers, Inc. Kirkpatrick & LockhartCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- In Re William Andrews Elana Andrews, Debtors. William Andrews Elana Andrews v. Lawrence J. Loheit, Chapter 13 TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- In Re DeSardiUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2006
- Perez v. PeakeDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2007
- Tidewater Finance Co. v. Curry (In Re Curry)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- In Re ErwinUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois · 2007
- In re HirschUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 2016
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.