Legal Opinion
In re Romero
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided October 9, 2015No. Case No. 15-26763-svkPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER SUSTAINING WELLS FARGO’S OBJECTION TO CONFIRMATION
Susan V. Kelley, Chief United States Bankruptcy Judge
Under Bankruptcy Code § 1325(a)(5)(B)(iii)(I), the holders of certain secured claims are. entitled to receive “equal monthly payments.” Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. d/b/a Wells Fargo Dealer Services (‘Wehs Fargo”) holds such a claim. The Debtors’ Chapter 13 plan proposes to pay post-confirmation adequate protection payments to Wells Fargo until the Debtors’ attorney’s fees are paid in full and then to begin higher payments until Wells Fargo’s claim is paid in full. Wells Fargo…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re DeSardiUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2006
- In Re HillUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2007
- In Re ErwinUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois · 2007
- In Re SanchezUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · 2008
- In Re KirkUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re MiceliUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
- In re WilliamsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
- Alberta SellersUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2022
- Barbara Jean RandellUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2022
- CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION v. THOMPSON, SR.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2019