Legal Opinion
Royals v. Massey (In Re Denton)
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Georgia
Decided June 12, 2007No. 19-40136PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
JOHN S. DALIS, Bankruptcy Judge.
This matter comes before me on the Motion for Contempt (“Motion”) filed by Clyde W. Royals, counsel for the Debtor (“Debtor’s Counsel”), against M. Elaina Massey, the chapter 13 trustee (“Trustee”). The Motion is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A).
The impetus for the Motion was a series of disbursement errors, acknowledged by the Trustee, that resulted in a shortfall of money available to pay attorney’s fees under the Debtor’s chapter 13 plan, so that Debtor’s Counsel received no money toward fees in this case for two…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Mullis v. United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of NevadaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Antoine v. Byers & Anderson, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Till v. SCS Credit Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
- L. Patrick Gray, III v. Griffin BellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Story v. LivingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Perez v. PeakeDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2007
- In Re ErwinUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois · 2007
- In re MiceliUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
- In re WilliamsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
- In Re MarksUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2008
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.