Blink Design, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
BARNETT, Judge:
Defendant, United States, moves to dismiss this case, pursuant to USCIT Rule 12(b)(1) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction or, in the alternative, pursuant to USCIT Rule 12(b)(5) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. (See generally Defi’s Mem. Supp. Mot. Dismiss (“Def.’s Mot.”).) Plaintiff, Blink Design, Inc. (“Blink”), opposes the motion. (See generally Mem. P. & A. Opp’n Def.’s Mot. Dismiss (“Pl.’s Opp’n”).) For the reasons stated below, the court finds that it lacks subject matter jurisdiction over Plaintiffs claims to the extent…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Perrin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Christopher v. Smithkline Beecham Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Trusted Integration, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Nationsbank of North Carolina, N. A. v. Variable Annuity Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- TR Int'l Trading Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2020
- Unichem Enters., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2024