Legal Opinion

Blink Design, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided May 21, 2014No. Slip Op. 14-56. Court 14-00032ErrataCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION & ORDER

BARNETT, Judge:

Defendant, United States, moves to dismiss this case, pursuant to USCIT Rule 12(b)(1) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction or, in the alternative, pursuant to USCIT Rule 12(b)(5) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. (See generally Defi’s Mem. Supp. Mot. Dismiss (“Def.’s Mot.”).) Plaintiff, Blink Design, Inc. (“Blink”), opposes the motion. (See generally Mem. P. & A. Opp’n Def.’s Mot. Dismiss (“Pl.’s Opp’n”).) For the reasons stated below, the court finds that it lacks subject matter jurisdiction over Plaintiffs claims to the extent…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Perrin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Christopher v. Smithkline Beecham Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
  4. Trusted Integration, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
  5. Nationsbank of North Carolina, N. A. v. Variable Annuity Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. TR Int'l Trading Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2020
  2. Unichem Enters., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API