Legal Opinion

Nationsbank of North Carolina, N. A. v. Variable Annuity Life Insurance

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 18, 1995No. 93-1612PublishedCited by 366 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Ginsburg

These consolidated cases present the question whether national banks may serve as agents in the sale of annuities. The Comptroller of the Currency, charged by Congress with superintendence of national banks, determined that federal law permits such annuity sales as a service to bank customers. Specifically, the Comptroller considered the sales at issue “incidental” to “the business of banking” under the National Bank Act, Rev. Stat. § 5136, as amended, 12 U. S. C. § 24 Seventh (1988 ed. and Supp. V). The Comptroller further concluded that annuities are not “insurance” within the meaning of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Clarke v. Securities Industry Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Atlantic Cleaners & Dyers, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Good Samaritan Hospital v. ShalalaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Investment Company Institute v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by366 opinions

  1. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Alexander v. SandovalSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Watters v. Wachovia Bank, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Barnhart v. WaltonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Smiley v. Citibank (South Dakota), N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996

361 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API