Legal Opinion

Unichem Enters., Inc. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided November 26, 2024No. 24-00033Published

1Opinion of the Court

Court No. 24-00033 Page 2 as to the entry’s admissibility within the time period provided by that statute.1 Pl.’s Compl. (“Compl.”) ¶¶ 11-20, ECF No. 5. Plaintiff requests that the court order Customs to admit and release the entry. Id. ¶ 20. Defendant responds that the instant admissibility determination is vested in the Drug Enforcement Agency (“DEA”) — not Customs. Def. Br. at 10. Defendant argues on this basis that Customs has not made a “protestable decision” under 19 U.S.C. § 1514(a)(4), and that, as a consequence, this court lacks subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1581(a).

Id…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Mitsubishi Electronics America, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
  3. United States Shoe Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
  4. Hartford Fire Insurance v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
  5. Crummey v. Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API