Unichem Enters., Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
Court No. 24-00033 Page 2 as to the entry’s admissibility within the time period provided by that statute.1 Pl.’s Compl. (“Compl.”) ¶¶ 11-20, ECF No. 5. Plaintiff requests that the court order Customs to admit and release the entry. Id. ¶ 20. Defendant responds that the instant admissibility determination is vested in the Drug Enforcement Agency (“DEA”) — not Customs. Def. Br. at 10. Defendant argues on this basis that Customs has not made a “protestable decision” under 19 U.S.C. § 1514(a)(4), and that, as a consequence, this court lacks subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1581(a).
Id…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Mitsubishi Electronics America, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- United States Shoe Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Hartford Fire Insurance v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Crummey v. Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.