Legal Opinion

Maney Aircraft Parts, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided January 21, 1972No. 191-70PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam: In this Wunderlich Act suit, plaintiff’s contract for tank assemblies for C-124 aircraft was terminated *161for default, and plaintiff appealed to the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals. That tribunal dismissed the appeal as untimely, i.e. taken more than 30 days after receipt of the notice of termination, and this action was then commenced. In addition to the contention that the appeal to the Board was timely, plaintiff argues that, in any event, the issuance of the default notice constituted a breach of contract for which the contractor can sue in this court without pursuing…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sol O. Schlesinger, Doing Business as Ideal Uniform Cap Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
  2. Dale Construction Co. v. United States, Seaboard Surety Co.United States Court of Claims · 1964
  3. Moran Bros., Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  4. Sol O. Schlesinger, D.B.A. Ideal Uniform Cap Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  5. Terminal Construction Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Cosmic Construction Co. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1982
  2. William Green Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
  3. D. Moody & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
  4. Tapper & Associates v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
  5. Gibson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1986

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API