Legal Opinion

State v. Buckingham

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1976No. File 11586PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLLMAN, Justice.

Defendant was found guilty by a jury on a charge of driving while intoxicated. He appeals from the judgment of conviction, contending that the trial court should not have admitted the results of a breathalyzer test because the investigating officer had failed to place him under formal arrest, had failed to request that he submit to such a test, and had failed to advise him of his right to refuse to submit to such test and of the consequences of such refusal. We reverse.

At approximately 12:45 a.m., July 28,1974, Officer M. R. Collins of the South Dakota Highway Patrol received…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Blow v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
  4. State v. WallinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
  5. People v. ToddIllinois Supreme Court · 1975

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. State v. WooleryIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State v. Big HeadSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  3. State v. NevilleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. HartmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  5. State v. BunnellSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API