Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. City of St. Paul v. Oehler

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 25, 1944No. 33,934PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1 Reported in 15 N.W.2d 783. With the consent of the attorney general, relators filed an information for a writ of quo warranto to test the right of respondent to the office of corporation counsel for the city of St. Paul. The writ having been issued by leave of this court, respondent served and filed his answer thereto, together with a notice of motion to vacate the order issuing the writ and to quash the information, the writ, and all proceedings thereunder. The notice of motion was supported by a lengthy affidavit purporting to recite the factual history of a controversy between him and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Young v. Village of KentSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  2. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1857
  3. People Ex Rel. Kinahan v. BlairIllinois Supreme Court · 1930
  4. State ex rel. City of St. Paul v. OehlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Danielson v. Village of MoundSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  2. State Ex Rel. City of St. Paul v. OehlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  3. State ex rel. City of St. Paul v. OehlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  4. State ex rel. Associated Master Barbers & Beauticians v. EischenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API