State ex rel. City of St. Paul v. Oehler
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Streissguth, Justice.
With the consent of the attorney general, relators filed an information for a writ of quo warranto to test the right of respondent to the office of corporation counsel for the city of St. Paul. The writ having been issued by leave of this court, respondent served and filed his answer thereto, together with a notice of motion to vacate the order issuing the writ and to quash the information, the writ, and all proceedings thereunder. The notice of motion was supported by a lengthy affidavit purporting to recite the factual history of a controversy between him and relators…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. C. M. Joiner Leasing Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Park v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- State ex rel. Young v. Village of KentSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- State ex rel. Early v. WunderlichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- Oikari v. Independent School District No. 40Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Minnesota Microwave, Inc. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- State Ex Rel. City of St. Paul v. OehlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944