Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Associated Master Barbers & Beauticians v. Eischen

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 16, 1956No. 36,784PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Thomas Gallagher, Justice.

This is a motion to quash a writ of quo warranto issued in proceedings now pending here in the above-entitled matter.

By writ of quo warranto issued from this court, relators, Associated Master Barbers & Beauticians of Minnesota and its officers, seek removal of respondents, Joseph Eischen and Peter Odegard, from their offices as members of the state Board of Barber Examiners. They contend that respondent Eischen is unqualified to serve as a member of said board because he is not “a practical barber who has followed the occupation of a barber in this state for at…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. One Oldsmobile Two-Door SedanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  2. Minnesota Baptist Convention v. Pillsbury AcademySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  3. In re O'ConnorNew York Supreme Court · 1943
  4. State Ex Rel. City of St. Paul v. OehlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  5. State ex rel. Childs v. GriffenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. Associated Master Barbers & Beauticians v. EischenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API