Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. City of St. Paul v. Oehler
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided November 28, 1944PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
3 Reported in 16 N.W.2d 765. This is an original quo warranto proceeding brought by the state upon the relation of the city of St. Paul and Bruce J. Broady to test the right of Harry W. Oehler to retain the office of corporation counsel of the city. On September 25, 1944, in State ex rel. City of St. Paul v. Oehler, 218 Minn. 287, 289, 15 N.W.2d 783,784, wherein we denied respondent's motion to vacate the order issuing the writ and to quash the proceedings, we said, in arriving at that conclusion:
"* * * The affidavits presented here are not sufficient to show that leave [to file the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. C. M. Joiner Leasing Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Park v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- State ex rel. Early v. WunderlichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- Oikari v. Independent School District No. 40Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Van Cleve v. WallaceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. IversonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- City of Duluth v. CervenySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- W. H. Barber Co. v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- Minneapolis-St. Paul Sanitary District v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- State v. SebaskyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.