Legal Opinion

Pomainville v. Bicknell

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided November 3, 1954No. 12PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCleary, J.

This is a bastardy case. Trial was by jury with a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. The case is here on the defendant’s exception to the refusal of the trial court to set the verdict aside on the grounds that it was against the weight of the evidence and against the law.

A medical expert testified for the defendant that it has been definitely established that two people whose blood is classified in Group O can only be parents of a child whose blood is classified in that group because there is no way that these parents can pass on the genes for any other group; that in the present case…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jordan v. MaceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1949
  2. Johnson v. ConeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1942
  3. Jordan v. DavisSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1948
  4. Izor v. BrighamSupreme Court of Vermont · 1941
  5. Peck v. GluckSupreme Court of Vermont · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Smith v. GroveSupreme Court of Vermont · 1956
  2. Rose v. RoseOhio Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. Commonwealth v. NathanicCambria County Court of Quarter Sessions · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API