Legal Opinion

Jordan v. Davis

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided February 17, 1948PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThaxter, J.

This is a bastardy action brought under the provisions of R. S. 1944, Chap. 153, Secs. 23-34. There was a trial before a jury which found for the complainant. The case is before us on a motion for a new trial.

There was ample evidence to satisfy the jury that the respondent had sexual intercourse with the complainant on August 12, 1945, and that she gave birth to a child on May 23, 1946. Except for the blood grouping test referred to later, there is no evidence whatsoever that anyone other than the respondent could have been responsible for her pregnancy. He did not take the stand to deny her…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Shanks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1945
  2. Saks v. SaksNew York Family Court · 1947
  3. Euclide v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Dellaria v. DellariaNew York Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Flippen v. MeinholdCity of New York Municipal Court · 1935

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Breithaupt v. AbramSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. State v. CampSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  3. Jordan v. MaceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1949
  4. Houghton v. HoughtonNebraska Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Anonymous v. AnonymousCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API