Legal Opinion

Peck v. Gluck

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 5, 1943PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSherburne, J.

This is an action to recover for personal injuries resulting from a collision between an automobile driven by Mrs. Burditt, in which the plaintiff was riding as a gratuitous guest, and a car driven by Gluck, on the ground of gross negligence as against the former, and on the ground of ordinary negligence as against the latter. Verdict and judgment were against both defendants. The defendant Burditt has alone excepted, and unless otherwise named she will be referred to as the defendant.

The accident happened in the forenoon of August 14, 1941, on the main highway from Rutland to West Rutland…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Shaw, Admr. v. MooreSupreme Court of Vermont · 1932
  2. Johnson v. ConeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1942
  3. Izor v. BrighamSupreme Court of Vermont · 1941
  4. Kerin, B.N.F. v. Coates C.I.T. Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1942
  5. Kelley v. AnthonySupreme Court of Vermont · 1939

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Smith v. GroveSupreme Court of Vermont · 1956
  2. State v. ValyouSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
  3. Huestis v. Estate of LaphamSupreme Court of Vermont · 1943
  4. Rivard v. RoySupreme Court of Vermont · 1963
  5. Emery v. SmallSupreme Court of Vermont · 1952

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API