Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Cone
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided October 6, 1942PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSherburne, J.
This action is based upon an automobile collision alleged to have been caused by the concurring negligence of both defendants. • Verdict and judgment were against both defendants, but defendant Cone has alone excepted. When not named Cone will be referred to herein as the defendant.
The accident happened at about 10 P. M. on May 31, 1941, in a rural area on Route 4 from Rutland to Woodstock opposite the entrance of a side road known as the Gleason road. Route 4 runs approximately east and west and at this point is straight with a good view of traffic in both directions. The road surface…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Kline v. Moyer and AlbertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Humphrey v. Twin State Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1927
- Perkins v. Vermont Hydro-Electric Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1934
- Shea v. PiletteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1937
- Shields v. Vermont Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1929
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- LaFaso v. LaFasoSupreme Court of Vermont · 1966
- Schatz v. CutlerDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1975
- Guilmette v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Vermont · 1969
- Dodge v. McArthurSupreme Court of Vermont · 1966
- Paquin v. St. Johnsbury Trucking Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1951
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.