Welsh v. Cross
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the qpinion.
1Opinion of the Court
A demurrer was sustained to the complaint and judgment entered for defendant, from which the plaintiff has appealed. A judgment was recovered in June, 1896, against plaintiff upon his promissory note made in 1892, and on the judgment a writ of execution was issued and levied upon the lands described in the complaint, which were regularly sold thereunder in October, 1900. At the time the promissory note was executed, and at the time the judgment was rendered, the judgment debtor was allowed, under section 702 of the Code of Civil Procedure, six months after sale in which to redeem real estate…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Green v. BiddleSupreme Court of the United States · 1823
- Von Hoffman v. City of QuincySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Edwards v. KearzeySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Brine v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Barnitz v. BeverlySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Brown v. FerdonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Lelande v. LoweryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Chapman v. JocelynCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Johnson v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- O'NEIL v. General Security Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1992
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.