Legal Opinion

Frank-Bretwisch v. Ryan

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 4, 2007No. A06-1864Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge. *

On appeal from the denial of his motion to increase respondent Lori Ann Frank-Bretwisch’s stipulated sub-guideline child-support obligation, appellant William Ryan challenges the determination of the district court that there was no substantial change in circumstances rendering respondent’s existing support obligation unreasonable and unfair. Because the findings of the district court are inadequate, particularly in failing to address the child’s best interests, we reverse and remand.

FACTS

A February 1997 parentage order adjudicated appellant the father of the parties’…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Interstate Power Co. v. Nobles County Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  2. Putz v. PutzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  3. Marriage of Erickson v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  4. Olson v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  5. State ex rel. Flint v. FlintSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API