Legal Opinion
Olson v. Olson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 21, 1995No. C7-93-2425PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GARDEBRING, Justice.
In this case we consider the reach of grandparent visitation rights authorized under Minn.Stat. § 257.022, subd. 2 (1992 & Supp.1995) (amended 1993). Appellant Ann Farr (Farr) petitioned the trial court for visitation with her granddaughter S.O., the child of Farr’s own daughter Sherry A. Olson-Kelm (Olson-Kelm) and Olson-Kelm’s former husband Scott Olson (Olson), because Olson-Kelm had denied Farr’s requests to see S.O. After several failed attempts at a negotiated resolution, the trial court granted Farr’s motion, finding that it was in the child’s best interests…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Prince v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Marriage of Pikula v. PikulaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Wallace v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- Roberts v. WardSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Christianson v. HenkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- Soohoo v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- Rohmiller v. HartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Haghighi v. Russian-American Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- Hagen v. SchirmersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.