State ex rel. Flint v. Flint
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by relator from an order of tlie district court for Ramsey county, Otis, J., discharging a writ of habeas corpus and ordering that the custody of a minor child remain in respondent until further order, subject to the conditions stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
The relator and the respondent are husband and wife, but have separated, and the former sued out a writ of habeas corpus to obtain the custody of their minor child. The parents were married in 1889, but their married life has been anything but a happy one. Disagreements between them commenced within a few *188months after their marriage, but gradually grew more and more serious, and finally culminated in the respondent’s leaving her husband, taking with her their child, aged between three and four years, and going to live with her married sister and her brother-in-law. While the parties lived…
2Cited by26 opinions
- Vangsness v. VangsnessCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- Allison v. BryanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Jacobs v. JacobsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- In Re the Marriage of CieslukSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
- Olson v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.