Legal Opinion
Mcfarland v. Heady
Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California
Decided February 24, 1954No. Civ. A. No. 18Published
1Opinion of the CourtConley, J.
The defendant appeals from a judgment for $2,500 awarded the plaintiff real estate broker for alleged services rendered by him in procuring a contract for the exchange of Fresno County property consisting of a motel.
The exchange was never, in fact, consummated because a condition understood, and stipulated to, by all of the interested parties was never fulfilled. The exchange agreement failed solely because a third party, who owned the land upon which the motel was located, refused to execute a new lease to the proposed purchaser upon satisfactory terms, this having been made a condition for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Colton v. O'BrienCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Ball v. California Conserving Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
- McAdoo v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Leipsic v. TaggartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Barrios v. FoleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.