Legal Opinion
Crosby v. Pacific S. S. Lines, Ltd.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 25, 1943No. 10155PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HANEY, Circuit Judge.
Appeal was attempted from an order confirming a report of a special master recommending that appellant’s petition for allowance of a commission be denied.
The parties assume that appellee is under the jurisdiction of the court below in a proceeding under § 77B of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 U.S.C.A. § 207. The record before us contains neither a petition nor an order disclosing that fact, but we treat the assumption of the parties as a concession of the fact.
Appellant filed a petition on June 17, 1941, alleging that within the preceding two years, appellee, by its president…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Norton v. LarneySupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Realty Holding Co. v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Sessions v. Pacific Improvement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1922
- Brea v. McGlashanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Bail v. GlantzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,198 Roy Huey v. Teledyne, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Zinn v. Ex-Cell-O Corp.California Supreme Court · 1944
- United States v. Certain Parcels of LandDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1953
- City of Buffalo v. Hanna Furnace Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1953
- In the Matter of American Precision Vibrator Company, Debtor. American Precision Vibrator Company v. National Air Vibrator Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.