Legal Opinion

Atchison v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided November 5, 1923No. B-90PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDowney, Judge

The action is predicated on a disallowance by the proper auditor of a part of plaintiff’s bill for personal transportation, the difference arising by reason of the application by the Government of a fare derived from a combination of individual and party fares. The question was settled adversely to the Government’s contention in Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. United States, 256 U. S. 205, appealed from this court.

The original action in this court, from the judgment in which the appeal was taken, was our number 33214, in which the petition was filed March 30,1916, and declared upon…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. The Haytian RepublicSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Stark v. StarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Nicholas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. Oregon—Washington Railroad & Navigation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1917

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lancaster v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1924
  2. Southern Pacific Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1924
  3. St. Louis, Brownsville & Mexico Railway Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API