Lancaster v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
*90MEMORANDUM BT THE COURT
There are four questions of law presented for consideration in this case.(1) The plaintiffs’ railroad was not a land-grant road, but was a party to an equalizing agreement by which it agreed to transport Government property on the same terms as land-grant railroads. The accounting officers refused to allow plaintiffs the benefit of the 50 per cent land-grant rate under the act of October 6, 1917, 40 Stat. 361, and made deduction for land grant at the rate of 100 per cent. Plaintiffs are entitled to recover the difference under the decisions in Baker, Receiver, v. United…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Baker v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1921
- Atchison v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1923
- Schaff v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1924
- St. Louis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.