Legal Opinion

Nicholas v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 7, 1921No. 10PublishedCited by 71 opinions

APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. Appeal from a judgment of the Court of Claims in a suit to recover the emoluments of an office accruing after appellant’s unlawful removal from it. See also post, 77-, 82.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Day

Claimant brought suit in the Court of Claims to recover compensation as inspector of customs at the port of Baltimore from February 20, 1913, to May 20, 1916, in the sum of $4,740.00, being at the rate of $4.00 per day for the period covered. He alleged that he was summarily removed from the service of the United States without charges of any kind being preferred against him, and without an opportunity to be heard, in violation of § 6 of an Act of Congress approved August 24, 1912, c. 389, 37 Stat. 555. He afterwards amended his petition so as to claim $4.00 per day to the day of rendering…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States Ex Rel. Arant v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1919

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. Myers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Ronald J. Cornetta v. The United States of America and John Lehman, Secretary of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  3. Alpert v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  4. Simon v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1949
  5. Boucher v. Division of Employment Security of the Department of LaborSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1954

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API