Legal Opinion

St. Louis, Brownsville & Mexico Railway Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided January 7, 1924No. B-180Published

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, Chief Justice

The plaintiff’s petition sets forth seven different items of claim. Of these, two bills, 1893-A and 2259 — A, are barred by the statute of limitations of six years, and they are abandoned on that account by the plaintiff. The plaintiff also relinquishes any claim on account of bills No. 3377 and No. 4001, these bills having been paid in full to the plaintiff by the disbursing officer. Afterwards, on settlement of this officer’s account by the Auditor for the War Department, his account was checked with the differences claimed in the petition on these bills. Subsequently the amounts were…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Savage v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. United States v. FrerichsSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  5. Spicer v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1869

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API