Legal Opinion

Ebbing v. City of Hamilton

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 30, 1985No. CA84-10-126PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.

This appeal questions the validity of a “working policy agreement” entered into between a municipality and its police department’s collective bargaining agent. The matter was submitted to the trial court on an agreed statement of facts which indicates the following:

Defendant-appellant, city of Hamilton, is a municipal corporation functioning under a charter form of government. The city’s charter has been in full force and effect at all times pertinent to the matters herein. The plaintiffs-appellees are all members of the Hamilton Police Department, and all plaintiffs, except for those having…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Mullin v. City of MansfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  2. United Brotherhood of Teamsters Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers, Local Union No. 377 v. City of YoungstownOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Niswonger v. City of CincinnatiOhio Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. Northern Ohio Patrolmen's Benevolent Ass'n v. City of North OlmstedOhio Court of Appeals · 1984

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of Cincinnati v. Ohio Council 8, American Federation of State, County & Municipal EmployeesOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Dale v. Ohio Civil Service Employees Ass'nOhio Supreme Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API