Legal Opinion

United Brotherhood of Teamsters Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers, Local Union No. 377 v. City of Youngstown

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1980No. 79-1683PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.

The home rule provision of the Ohio Con*160stitution, Section 7 of Article XVIII, gives municipalities the right to adopt charters. It reads:

“Any municipality may frame and adopt or amend a charter for its government and may, subject to the provisions of Section 3 of this article, exercise thereunder all powers of local self-government.”1

Youngstown exercised its right and adopted a charter. Section 10 of that charter provides:

“Subject to the provisions of this Charter, Council shall fix by ordinance, the salary or compensation of all officers and employees of the City government***.”

The right of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Northern Ohio Patrolmen's Benevolent Ass'n v. City of ParmaOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State ex rel. Mullin v. City of MansfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1971

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. City of Rocky River v. State Employment Relations BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State ex rel. Vukovich v. Youngstown Civil Service CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  3. In Re Appeal of MoreoOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Ebbing v. City of HamiltonOhio Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Bowers v. Columbus Municipal Civil Service CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API