Legal Opinion

Niswonger v. City of Cincinnati

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 6, 1968No. 10418PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShannon, J.

This comes to us as an appeal on questions of law in a matter in which the plaintiffs sought a declaratory judgment.

It is a class action brought by a detective on active duty and a retired detective of the Crime Bureau of the Division of Police of the city of Cincinnati against that city seeking a declaratory judgment that they and the defendants (other than Wichman, Sandman and Schrotel), who were or are detectives on the day shift in the crime bureau, were entitled to be paid for their one-half hour lunch period, amounting to two and one-half hours per week, from June 17, 1960, which is six…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Buckman v. MunsonOhio Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Wright v. City of LorainOhio Court of Appeals · 1942
  3. Kluth v. AndrusOhio Court of Appeals · 1951

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ebright v. City of WhitehallOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Ebbing v. City of HamiltonOhio Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Miller v. Village of Lincoln HeightsOhio Court of Appeals · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API