Legal Opinion

City of Cincinnati v. Ohio Council 8, American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 27, 1991No. 90-544PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHerbert R. Brown, J.

This case presents two issues for our determination: (1) whether, under R.C. Chapter 4117, the Public Employees’ Collective Bargaining Act, a provision in a collective bargaining agreement prevails over a conflicting provision in a municipal home-rule charter, and (2) whether the collective bargaining agreement at issue here requires the city to deduct contributions to PEOPLE. For the reasons which follow, we answer the first query in the affirmative, but find that the record does not contain sufficient evidence to resolve the second, and remand for further proceedings.

I

Home-Rule Charters and…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United Public Workers of America v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. United States Civil Service Commission v. National Ass'n of Letter CarriersSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. National Labor Relations Board v. Wooster Division of Borgwarner Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Fort v. Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Parsons v. FlemingOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Painter v. GraleyOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Southwest Ohio Regional Transit Authority v. Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 627Ohio Supreme Court · 2001
  4. United Black Firefighters Ass'n v. City of AkronCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
  5. Southwest Ohio Regional Transit Auth. v. Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 627Ohio Supreme Court · 2001

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API