Dale v. Ohio Civil Service Employees Ass'n
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtH. Brown, J.
In this case, we must determine what standard applies to a defamation claim founded on statements made in the course of a union election, and whether Dale may recover under the appropriate standard. For the reasons which follow, we conclude that an “actual malice” standard applies, and that Dale has not presented sufficient evidence to recover under this standard. Accordingly, we reverse the courts below and enter judgment for AFSCMEÍ7
I
Standard of Proof Required in Defamation Claims Arising From Statements Made ■ During Union Representation Elections Conducted Under SERB Jurisdiction
At common…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- St. Amant v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Curtis Publishing Co. v. ButtsSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- A & B-Abell Elevator Co. v. Columbus/Central Ohio Building & Construction Trades CouncilOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Gosden v. LouisOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
- A & B-Abell Elevator Co. v. Columbus/Cent. Ohio Bldg. & Constr. Trades CouncilOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Hinerman v. Daily Gazette Co., Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1992
- Susan B. Anthony List v. Steven DriehausCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.