Legal Opinion
Edwards v. Hutchinson
Washington Supreme Court
Decided August 25, 1934No. 25247. En BancPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.
Robert R. Edwards, the plaintiff below, has appealed from a judgment dismissing his ac tion after the sustaining of a demurrer to his complaint and his refusal to amend. The question before us is whether or not the complaint states a cause of action.
By his complaint, the appellant alleges that he is a citizen and taxpayer of this state and a fisherman by occupation, dnly licensed as such, and that he will suffer direct, special and pecuniary injury, peculiar to himself and those similarly situated, differing from that suffered by the general public, if the proposed initiative measure, No. 77,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State ex rel. Case v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Alaska Coast Co. v. Alaska Barge Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
- State ex rel. Berry v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1916
- State ex rel. Howell v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- Gibson v. CampbellWashington Supreme Court · 1925
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- City of Sequim v. MalkasianWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- Dankman v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & EthicsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
- In Re Initiative Petition No. 142, State Question No. 205Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Sudduth v. ChapmanWashington Supreme Court · 1977
- State Ex Rel. Donohue v. CoeWashington Supreme Court · 1956
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.