Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Donohue v. Coe

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1956No. 34020, 34021PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

We are here concerned with two attempts, one by a common-law proceeding and the other based upon the initiative statute (Laws of 1913, chapter 138, p. 418, as amended [cf. RCW 29.79]), to prohibit the secretary of state from certifying an initiative measure to the ballot. The superior court for Thurston county entered an order on the first day of October, 1956, in the proceeding based upon the statute, enjoining the secretary of state from certifying the initiative measure “for inclusion on the ballot to be voted on on November 6, 1956”; and in the common-law action he entered, on the same…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Case v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Alaska Coast Co. v. Alaska Barge Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Morrill v. Title Guaranty & Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917
  4. State ex rel. Harris v. HinkleWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  5. State ex rel. Griffiths v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. City of Sequim v. MalkasianWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. Conifer Enterprises, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Ford v. LoganWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Maleng v. King County Corrections GuildWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Maleng v. King County Corrections GuildWashington Supreme Court · 2003

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API