Sudduth v. Chapman
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRosellini, J.
The appellant brought an action in the Superior Court for Thurston County, pursuant to RCW *24929.79.210, seeking a writ of mandate to compel the respondent Secretary of State to certify to the ballot Initiative 322, popularly known as the "anti-fluoridation" measure. The respondent had, after canvasing the petitions, determined that they lacked sufficient signatures to qualify under Const, art. 2, § 1A (amendment 30).1
Evidence introduced by the appellant at the Superior Court hearing showed that the respondent had rejected the signatures of 4,656 registered voters because they had signed petitions…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Knowles v. HollyWashington Supreme Court · 1973
- State ex rel. Case v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Alaska Coast Co. v. Alaska Barge Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
- Renck v. Superior Court of Maricopa CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1947
- Seymour v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1893
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- City of Sequim v. MalkasianWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- Coppernoll v. ReedWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Coppernoll v. ReedWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Thomas v. BaileyAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- 1000 Friends of Washington v. McFarlandWashington Supreme Court · 2006
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.