Dankman v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
On October 13,1981, we ordered “that the order of the Board [of Elections and Ethics] *509hereby is set aside and the cause is remanded to the Board with directions to certify, nunc pro tunc as of August 3, 1981, Initiative Seven for inclusion on the November 3, 1981, ballot.” The order noted that Chief Judge NEWMAN and Associate Judges MACK and PRYOR dissented, and that “[o]pinions will be filed as promptly as the business of the court permits.”
The opinion of Associate Judge HARRIS is joined by Associate Judges KELLY, KERN, and NEBEKER, Chief Judge NEWMAN and Associate Judges MACK, FER-REN, and…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States Ex Rel. Accardi v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1954
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Adams v. George W. Cochran & Co., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- Dell v. Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Davis v. MooreDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- English v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
- Drayton v. Poretsky Management, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.