Legal Opinion

Pierce Oil Corporation v. Phoenix Ref. Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 25, 1920No. 10550PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Order of the State Corporation Commission. Complaint before the Corporation Commission by the Phoenix Refining Company against the Pierce Oil Corporation and Clay Arthur Pierce. From order of Commission requiring defendants to give complainant service in its oil pipe line and revoking former order exempting defendants from obligations of a common carrier, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtMcNEILL, J.

This action was commenced before the Corporation Commission by the Phoenix Refining Company against the Pierce Oil Corporation and Clay Arthur Pierce. The complaint alleged the Phoenix Refining Company was a corporation operating a refinery at Sand Springs, Okla., and owned certain oil leases in ¡the Cushing oil fields which were producing oil; that the Pierce Oil Corporation was the owner of a pipe line extending from Cushing oil fields to Sand Springs, and for several years had been transporting the oil of the complainant from the Cushing oil fields to Sand Springs, and had transported the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lane v. WattsSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Noble State Bank v. HaskellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. Associated Pipe Line Co. v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Ft. Smith & W. Ry. Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  5. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Continental Supply Co. v. Geo. H. Greenan Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  2. In Re Assessment of Champlin Refining Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  3. Fitzsimmons v. RauchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API