Lane v. Watts
Supreme Court of the United States
APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP APPEALS OP THE DISTRICT ' OP COLUMBIA. The facts, which involve the title to lands assigned on one pf the Baca Float Grants issued in substitution of the Las Vegas Grant, are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKenna
delivered the opinion of the court.. Appeal from the decree of the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia affirming a decree of the Supreme ■Court of the District-enjoining, the Secretary of the Interior and the Commissioner of the General Land Office from proceeding in the matter of certain attempted entries under the public land laws of the United States upon lands which the decree finds were selected and located by the heirs of Luis Maria Cabeza de Baca on June 17, 1863, and known as Baca Float No. 3, the title to which, the decree further finds, passed out of the United States and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Philadelphia Co. v. StimsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Noble v. Union River Logging RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Priest v. Trustees of Town of Las VegasSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Ballinger v. United States Ex Rel. FrostSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Shaw v. KelloggSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Pueblo of Jemez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Morrison v. WorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Payne v. Central Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- American Water Development, Inc. v. City of AlamosaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.